Promotional Allowance Program Regulations

Understanding promotional allowance program regulations can be a bear, but if you want to design a market development funds (MDF) or Co-Op program that your corporate legal team and finance department will love, understand them you must.

This Incentive Insights takes a look at how the Robinson-Patman and Sarbanes-Oxley acts affect your promotional allowance programs.

The Robinson-Patman Act requires that a seller offer all competing resellers similar programs in a proportionately equal manner. But how does the legislation define key points in this statement such as “competing resellers” or “offer”?

Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) regulatory requirements address issues born out of the Enron and Worldcom scandals. A side effect of SOX is many marketers classify their reimbursement expenses as contra-revenue, which can show up as sales decreases when reporting revenue. A better solution is understanding how to categorize reimbursement expenses against SOX requirements.

Learn more when you read Incentive Insights: Promotional Allowance Program Regulations.

About the Author

Craig DeWolf, Perks WW VP, Marketing Enablement, has over 30 years of channel program and trade marketing experience spanning a variety of industries and distribution models including technology and consumer product companies. As Vice President, Marketing Enablement he provides a unique multi-industry perspective gleaned from a background working across agency, supplier, and vendor/manufacturer roles. Craig has engaged with key business partners and worked with a variety of clients on both channel and trade strategies and programs, including: AT&T, Apple, Avaya, Bridgestone Goodrich, Canon USA, Hewlett-Packard, Kraft, Oracle, Panasonic, Timex and Xerox. Immediately before joining Perks Worldwide, Craig held senior roles at Hawk Incentives, Hawkeye Channel, and CCI—a work history that shows his deep understanding of the channel space.

More Content by Craig DeWolf